Ukraine
has witnessed intense fighting since 24 February 2022. The brutal invasion by
Russia has created a grave humanitarian crisis affecting millions of people. Residents
in eastern Ukraine and other regions have endured eight years of the conflict.
Still, the intensification and the fast spread of the conflict across the
country risks a scale of death and destruction, frightening in contemplation,
given the military capacities involved. Over
three million Ukrainians have fled the country, while many are trapped in towns
and cities encircled by Russians with no route for escape. The dire
humanitarian situation calls for large-scale assistance by scaling supplies,
services and creating safe humanitarian corridors for the civilians trapped in
cities under siege. According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination
of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), the Ukraine conflict has resulted in the loss
of lives, mass movement and displacement, injuries, and severe damage and
destruction of residential housing and civilian infrastructure. Public service
utilities such as heating, electricity, water, social services, and ambulatory
services are under severe pressure. The International Committee of the Red
Cross (ICRC) reports that Ukrainians' access to primary healthcare services
continues to be limited by shrinking humanitarian space and growing insecurity.
Expert
Perspectives On
March 1, the United Nations and humanitarian partners launched coordinated
emergency appeals requesting $1.7 billion to deliver humanitarian support to
people in Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees in neighboring countries[1].
Further, OCHA asked for another $1.1 billion in assisting 6 million people
trapped in Ukraine for three months. OCHA fund would cater for cash assistance
to the vulnerable, water, sanitation, protection services, shelter services,
rebuilding of damaged residential homes, food assistance, and education
services. The plan also includes
delivering support to authorities, helping establish and maintain transit and
reception centers for the displaced hence protecting civilians from gender-based
violence and sexual exploitation. CARE[2]
launched a humanitarian appeal to support the most vulnerable in Ukraine,
particularly women-headed households and the elderly. Ukraine Humanitarian
Crisis Fund seeks to provide life-saving assistance to the 4 million people
impacted by the conflict. Florence Gillette[3],
head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Kyiv, reiterated
the need for the parties in the conflict to respect international humanitarian
law noting that, ‘'all parties to the conflict have a legal obligation to
ensure that military operations are planned and conducted in a way as to ensure
the protection of civilians and civilian objects''. ICRC and OCHA called
for the protection of critical infrastructures such as gas, water, and
electrical systems providing civilian schools, homes, and healthcare facilities. Using
airlifts Douglas J. Feith, a senior fellow at
Hudson Institute, and John Hannah, a
senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security, have recently
called for a humanitarian airlift noting it could save Ukraine. The two experts
argue that a humanitarian airlift would mirror the World War Berlin airlift. In
the meantime, airlift would allow the provision of food, water, medicine, and
other essential supplies to Kherson, Mariupol, Kharkiv, and other cities
besieged by Russian forces. However, a humanitarian airlift would not be
without risks as Russian forces could shoot down planes and claim it as ‘'accidental,''
but it is worth taking to save Ukrainians. The United States and Europe can
coordinate the airlift and notify the Russians of the flight plans to avoid ‘'accidental''
shootings[4]. Former
U.S generals called for the humanitarian airlifts to Ukraine, decrying NATO's
passive response to the Russian attacks. James Jones, NATO supreme allied
commander Europe (SACEUR) from 2003 and 2005, called for the humanitarian
airlift to be protected by military fighter jets for safety[5].
The generals noted the humanitarian situation is catastrophic and continues to worsen
unless a humanitarian airlift is organized to assist Ukrainians trapped in
besieged cities. The idea of having fighter jets escort the humanitarian
aircraft would offer protection and help get more volunteer pilots willing to
fly into the besieged cities to deliver humanitarian supplies. However, the involvement of fight jets would
create tensions between European powers and U.S involvement in the war, but it
would help send a message to President Putin and Russia. U.S Representative
Young Kim and Senator Roger Wicker called for an immediate humanitarian airlift
from the United States to Ukraine to assist besieged civilians and military
support. Humanitarian
corridors The
humanitarian situation in Ukraine continues to worsen. In Mariupol city,
residents are running short of water, food, and medicine. Many of them have no
electricity in wintertime, and the suffering is widespread more than in neighboring
media. The need for humanitarian corridors has become dire as Russia continues
with the bombing. Russia claims to be letting people move through humanitarian
corridors. Still, in reality, such corridors have been targeted by gunfire and
bombing, with a recent incident being in Irpin outside Kyiv. On
March 3rd March 2022, Russian and Ukraine agreed to create ten
humanitarian corridors to allow the evacuation of the civilians trapped in
cities facing bombardment. However, no significant progress in creating the
corridors, and the operating corridors continue to be targeted by Russian
forces. Agnes Callamard, Amnesty International Secretary-General, called for the
immediate establishment of Genuine humanitarian corridors to allow a safe,
effective, and quicker evacuation for the civilians[6]. Further,
Amnesty International called out Russian forces for the assault on civilians
and destruction of critical infrastructure as a violation of the Geneva and
International human rights law, and Russia must be held responsible. It is inhumane for Russians to besiege cities cutting
supply lines for vital necessities such as food, water, and medicine, and
humanitarian corridors must be protected for all civilians fleeing from the
conflict. Russian force's conduct violates international humanitarian law,
specifically Protocol I of the Geneva Convention. Limited
humanitarian no-fly zones Earlier
in the month, a dozen foreign policy experts had called for the United States
and Nato to institute a partial no-fly zone over Ukraine to protect civilians
against Russian bombers. The experts argued for a limited No-Fly zone over
Ukraine to protect humanitarian corridors to allow civilians to flee from the
besieged cities. The experts led by William Taylor, former U.S ambassador to
Ukraine, Alexander Vershbow, Former U.S ambassador to Russia and Nato, and
Former U.S ambassador to NATO, called for notification to Russian officials
that the limited No-Fly zone would not be a confrontation with Russian forces
but also make it clear that Russian attacks on civilian areas must stop. Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky had called for No-Fly Zone to be imposed in
Ukraine. The request was rejected by NATO and the United States, fearing a
military confrontation with Russia. NATO Secretary-General noted that NATO
imposition of the No-Fly Zone would be catastrophic and would lead to massive
loss of Ukrainian lives. Retired General
Philip Breedlove suggested a humanitarian no-fly zone. General Breedlove, a
former NATO supreme allied commander, noted that the humanitarian no-fly zone
would be done through a ‘'coalition of the willing'' that would help construct
a humanitarian operation that protects humanitarian relief corridors and all
manner of things below them[7].
It does not require military action unless Russian attacks the humanitarian
zone, necessitating a response. Gen. Breedlove told Fox News that such a
humanitarian initiative would be suitable to avoid escalation and confrontation
with the Russians, who seem prepared to fight. The experts support the suggestion
of a humanitarian no fly-zone which is reasonable and provides a non-military
solution to the civilians trapped in the Ukrainian cities. While the need to deescalate
is necessary, Russia and President Putin should not be left to terrorize
civilians, most of whom are vulnerable through cutting supplies and blocking
humanitarian assistance and corridors. Douglas J. Feith and John Hannah argued
that a humanitarian no-fly zone would send a message to Russia that the world
would not stand and watch brutality against civilians in total violation of international
laws. Conclusion The
humanitarian situation in Ukraine is worsening and requires immediate response
through Airlift, the establishment of safe humanitarian corridors, and
humanitarian no-fly zones. NATO and the United States should lead the humanitarian
efforts, especially in establishing humanitarian corridors and humanitarian no
fly-zones. The UN, CARE, ICRC, and Amnesty international are leading efforts to
raise funds for supplies to the people of Ukraine in distress. Humanitarian
supplies require support from NATO and the U.S to ensure safety by providing
safe corridors and no-fly zones. Airlifting humanitarian supplies to the region
would risk attacks from Russian forces on the ground, which could escalate the
war and cause more destruction and loss of lives. However, Russia should be
informed of the establishment of corridors and humanitarian no-fly zones as a
matter of urgency, and humanitarian efforts should proceed with or without Russia's
support. The fate of Ukrainian civilians should not be left at the mercy of a brutal
military, and a leader aimed determined to fulfill his territorial fantasies
through blood, death, and pain. U.S and NATO should supplement the humanitarian
efforts currently being undertaken by International Non-governmental
organizations through airlift and humanitarian no-fly zone.
Geofrey Robert is an experienced freelance researcher and writer with over five years of experience. He holds a Bachelor of law from Kenyatta University (Nairobi, Kenya). His research interests are: International law, Peace & Security, Conflict, humanitarian issues, and climate change. He worked as a peace and security news writer for Peacehumanity.org. and also contributed to their periodic PEACE MONITOR MAGAZINE as a peace researcher and writer focusing on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
[1] https://www.unocha.org/ukraine/about-ocha-ukraine
[2] https://www.icrc.org/en/humanitarian-crisis-ukraine?msclkid=0d640ef3b02911eca686679cf1fedc0e
[3] https://www.care.org/our-work/disaster-response/emergencies/ukraine-humanitarian-crisis/?msclkid=0d6533c1b02911ec88c4e452af7b7d9a
[4] https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-humanitarian-airlift-for-ukraine-russia-vladimir-putin-nato-11647289453?msclkid=c2f58fd1b03211ecaf0cfba41006db9d
[5] https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-former-us-generals-call-for-humanitarian-airlifts-to-ukraine-decry/
[6] https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/03/ukraine-humanitarian-corridors-for-civilians-fleeing-russian-attacks-must-provide-safety-new-testimonies
[7] https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-russia-humanitarian-no-fly-zone?msclkid=4b3c9ce5b03e11ec971b74b76ab0c7f2 (0) COMMENTSWelcome to the discussion.
|